MD. GULAM ABBAS & ORS. versus MD. IBRAHIM & ORS.
Section 144 CrPC empowers Magistrates to make temporary orders to prevent danger to human life, health, safety, or public tranquility; it cannot be invoked to resolve questions of title or individual rights, which should be decided in civil suits. No hard and fast rule can guide the exercise of Section 144 power; it must depend on facts and circumstances of each case.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Md. Gulam Abbas & Ors.; Respondent: Md. Ibrahim & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Review Petition / Supreme Court Order on Review Application
- Outcome
- Review Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Section 144 Cr PC, Jurisdiction of Magistrates, Public Order, Civil Remedies Vs Criminal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Md. Gulam Abbas & Ors.
Petitioner
Md. Ibrahim & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Petition / Supreme Court Order on Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the principles guiding exercise of jurisdiction under Section 144 of the CrPC by Magistrates?
- 2 Can questions of title or rights to property be decided under Section 144 or in writ proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 144 CrPC empowers Magistrates to make temporary orders to prevent danger to human life, health, safety, or public tranquility; it cannot be invoked to resolve questions of title or individual rights, which should be decided in civil suits. No hard and fast rule can guide the exercise of Section 144 power; it must depend on facts and circumstances of each case.
Court Disposition
Review Petition dismissed
Orders
- No orders as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment