MESSRS. BRAHMACHARI RESEARCH INSTITUTE versus ITS WORKMEN
The gratuity provided under the award on retrenchment is nothing more nor less than retrenchment compensation under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workmen are only entitled to one or the other, whichever is more advantageous, and cannot claim both. The appellant having paid compensation under Section 25F, the workmen are not entitled to anything more under the award.
- Parties
- Appellant: Messrs. Brahmachari Research Institute; Respondent: Its Workmen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 1959
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Labour Appellate Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Retrenchment Compensation, Gratuity Scheme, Industrial Disputes Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Messrs. Brahmachari Research Institute
Appellant
Its Workmen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Labour Appellate Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether retrenched workmen are entitled to gratuity under the award in addition to retrenchment compensation under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Ratio Decidendi
The gratuity provided under the award on retrenchment is nothing more nor less than retrenchment compensation under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The workmen are only entitled to one or the other, whichever is more advantageous, and cannot claim both. The appellant having paid compensation under Section 25F, the workmen are not entitled to anything more under the award.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Set aside the decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal
- Restore the decision of the Industrial Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment