MICHAEL B. FERNANDES versus C.K. JAFFER SHARIEF AND ORS .
On a plain reading of Section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, only the returned candidate and candidates against whom allegations of corrupt practice have been made are required to be joined as party respondents; others, including Election Commissioner, Returning Officer, and Chief Electoral Officer, cannot be made parties to an election petition; petitions not complying are liable to be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Michael B. Fernandes; Respondent: C.K. Jaffer Sharief; Respondent: Election Commissioner; Respondent: Returning Officer; Respondent: Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Karnataka High Court Order Deleting Respondents From Election Petition
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Parties to Election Petition, Joinder of Parties, Representation of the People Act, 1951
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael B. Fernandes
Appellant
C.K. Jaffer Sharief
Respondent
Election Commissioner
Respondent
Returning Officer
Respondent
Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Karnataka High Court Order Deleting Respondents From Election Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Who can be arrayed as parties to an election petition under Section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951?
- 2 Whether Election Commissioner, Returning Officer, or Chief Electoral Officer can be added as respondents in an election petition?
Ratio Decidendi
On a plain reading of Section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, only the returned candidate and candidates against whom allegations of corrupt practice have been made are required to be joined as party respondents; others, including Election Commissioner, Returning Officer, and Chief Electoral Officer, cannot be made parties to an election petition; petitions not complying are liable to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; impugned judgment affirmed; deletion of Election Commissioner, Returning Officer, and Chief Electoral Officer as respondents in election petition upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment