ELIZABETH ANTONY versus MICHEL CHARLES JOHN CHOWN LENGERA

ELIZABETH ANTONY versus MICHEL CHARLES JOHN CHOWN LENGERA

The petitioner has not substantiated caveatable interest as neither copies nor originals of the alleged will or gift deed were filed, and the trust is not in existence; thus, the caveatable interest was not established, and the courts below rightly struck off the caveat.

Parties
Petitioner: Elizabeth Antony; Respondent: Michel Charles John Chown Lengera
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 April 1990
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Admission
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Probate, Caveatable Interest, Revocation of Probate
Succession Law Probate Caveatable Interest Revocation of Probate

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elizabeth Antony

Petitioner

Michel Charles John Chown Lengera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Admission

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner has a caveatable interest in opposing probate of the will.
  2. 2 Whether findings regarding caveatable interest restrict the right to seek revocation of probate.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner has not substantiated caveatable interest as neither copies nor originals of the alleged will or gift deed were filed, and the trust is not in existence; thus, the caveatable interest was not established, and the courts below rightly struck off the caveat.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Special leave petition dismissed