STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. versus MILAP CHAND JAIN & ANR. ETC.

The Supreme Court held that instant SLPs challenging the same order previously dismissed are not maintainable on the ground of parity; allowing one set but not the other would be discriminatory.

Parties: Petitioner: State of Rajasthan & Anr.; Respondent: Milap Chand Jain & Anr. etc.
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 01 May 2013
Procedural Posture: Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on Slps
Outcome: SLPs dismissed
Legal Topics: SLP Maintainability, Parity in Adjudication, Carrier Advancement Scheme

Practice and Procedure SLP Maintainability Parity in Adjudication Carrier Advancement Scheme

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

State of Rajasthan & Anr.

Petitioner

Milap Chand Jain & Anr. etc.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Decision on Slps

Legal Issues

1 Whether fresh SLPs can be entertained on the same impugned order already adjudicated by Supreme Court
2 Parity in treatment of teachers affected by same order

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that instant SLPs challenging the same order previously dismissed are not maintainable on the ground of parity; allowing one set but not the other would be discriminatory.

Court Disposition

SLPs dismissed

Orders

All special leave petitions are dismissed as devoid of merit solely on the ground of parity.
SLP (C) CC No. 9440 of 2013 dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner’s request.