MINERAL EXPLORATION CORPORATION. LTD. versus ARVIND KUMAR DIXIT AND ANOTHER

MINERAL EXPLORATION CORPORATION. LTD. versus ARVIND KUMAR DIXIT AND ANOTHER

The cut-off date of 01.04.2003 for wage revision is justified by financial restructuring and Government communication, is neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional, and only employees in service on or after this date are entitled to wage revision; those who retired prior are not entitled to notional wage revision.

Parties
Appellant: Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd.; Respondent: Arvind Kumar Dixit and Another
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 December 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision
Outcome
appeals allowed
Legal Topics
Wage Revision, Cut Off Date, Voluntary Retirement, Public Sector Undertaking, Equality Under Article 14

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mineral Exploration Corporation Ltd.

Appellant

Arvind Kumar Dixit and Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether fixing cut-off date 1.4.2003 for wage revision is arbitrary or violates Article 14
  2. 2 Whether employees retired prior to 1.4.2003 are entitled to notional wage revision

Ratio Decidendi

The cut-off date of 01.04.2003 for wage revision is justified by financial restructuring and Government communication, is neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional, and only employees in service on or after this date are entitled to wage revision; those who retired prior are not entitled to notional wage revision.

Court Disposition

appeals allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of High Court and Central Administrative Tribunal set aside
  • Employees who retired prior to 1.4.2003 are not entitled to notional wage revision