MINERVA MILLS LTD versus THEIR WORKERS.
The appropriate government has the power under section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to constitute an industrial tribunal for a specified period and to form a new tribunal, after expiry of that period, to hear and dispose of pending references. There is no illegality in constituting the tribunal for a fixed period or in the government's subsequent reference of pending disputes to a new tribunal. The new tribunal may proceed from the stage at which the previous tribunal had left the disputes, and there is no requirement to begin de novo, particularly where only issues were framed and no prejudice is caused.
- Parties
- Appellant: Minerva Mills Ltd.; Respondent: Their Workers
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 1953
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Disputes, Constitution of Tribunals, Powers of State Government Under Industrial Disputes Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minerva Mills Ltd.
Appellant
Their Workers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Government has power to constitute an industrial tribunal for a fixed period and then constitute a new tribunal upon expiry of that period to dispose of pending references.
- 2 Whether the new tribunal so constituted can proceed from the stage reached by the previous tribunal or must begin de novo.
- 3 Whether the withdrawal of disputes from the earlier tribunal to the new tribunal was legal and valid under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate government has the power under section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to constitute an industrial tribunal for a specified period and to form a new tribunal, after expiry of that period, to hear and dispose of pending references. There is no illegality in constituting the tribunal for a fixed period or in the government's subsequent reference of pending disputes to a new tribunal. The new tribunal may proceed from the stage at which the previous tribunal had left the disputes, and there is no requirement to begin de novo, particularly where only issues were framed and no prejudice is caused.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed.
Orders
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment