M/S. ANGILE INSULATIONS versus M/S. DAVY ASHMORE INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

M/S. ANGILE INSULATIONS versus M/S. DAVY ASHMORE INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

The parties, by clear and explicit clause (21), agreed to vest jurisdiction for any legal proceedings within the territorial limit of High Court of Karnataka. Clause (21) is not invalid under Section 23 or 28 of the Contract Act; therefore, the Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad, has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the plaint was rightly returned for presentation to the proper court.

Parties
Appellant: Mis. Angile Insulations; Respondent: Mis. Davy Ashmore India Ltd.; Respondent: Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 April 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Hearing/decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Contractual Agreements on Jurisdiction, Validity of Jurisdiction Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mis. Angile Insulations

Appellant

Mis. Davy Ashmore India Ltd.

Respondent

Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Hearing/decision

  1. 1 Whether the Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad had jurisdiction to entertain the suit in view of the jurisdiction clause in the contract.
  2. 2 Whether Clause (21) of the contract ousts jurisdiction lawfully and is not hit by Sections 23 and 28 of the Contract Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The parties, by clear and explicit clause (21), agreed to vest jurisdiction for any legal proceedings within the territorial limit of High Court of Karnataka. Clause (21) is not invalid under Section 23 or 28 of the Contract Act; therefore, the Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad, has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the plaint was rightly returned for presentation to the proper court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No costs