M/S. ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION versus PAWANHANS HELICOPTERS PVT LTD
If delay in completion of contractual works is attributable to the respondent and the contract permits escalation, payment of escalation charges is justified, and issuance of 'No Dues Certificate' under duress does not bar genuine claims; Court must not interfere with the arbitrator's view when it is plausible.
- Parties
- Appellant: MIS. ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION; Respondent: PAWANHANS HELICOPTERS PVT LTD
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bombay High Court Division Bench
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Arbitral Award Challenge, Contractual Price Escalation, Duress in Contract, No Dues Certificate, Government Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIS. ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION
Appellant
PAWANHANS HELICOPTERS PVT LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bombay High Court Division Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral award allowing escalation charges to the contractor was valid.
- 2 Whether the 'No Dues Certificate' issued by the contractor precludes further claims under duress.
- 3 Whether the delay in work completion attributable to the respondent entitled the appellant to compensation.
Ratio Decidendi
If delay in completion of contractual works is attributable to the respondent and the contract permits escalation, payment of escalation charges is justified, and issuance of 'No Dues Certificate' under duress does not bar genuine claims; Court must not interfere with the arbitrator's view when it is plausible.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Division Bench judgment of Bombay High Court set aside.
- Judgment of Single Judge restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment