M/S. CONSTRUCTION INDIA versus SECRETARY, WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA AND ORS.
Appointment of an arbitrator by name gives jurisdiction even if the arbitrator ceases to hold the office mentioned; withdrawal of objection by respondents amounts to acquiescence, precluding challenge to jurisdiction; a mere inadvertent error in minute recording does not warrant setting aside an arbitral award.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mis. Construction India; Respondents: Secretary, Works Department, Government of Orissa and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside; Subordinate Judge orders upholding awards and granting decrees in terms of awards are upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Arbitrator, Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Acquiescence in Arbitration Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mis. Construction India
Appellant
Secretary, Works Department, Government of Orissa and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a named arbitrator loses jurisdiction upon ceasing to hold the designated office.
- 2 Whether inadvertent mistake in recording minutes is sufficient for setting aside an arbitral award.
Ratio Decidendi
Appointment of an arbitrator by name gives jurisdiction even if the arbitrator ceases to hold the office mentioned; withdrawal of objection by respondents amounts to acquiescence, precluding challenge to jurisdiction; a mere inadvertent error in minute recording does not warrant setting aside an arbitral award.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside; Subordinate Judge orders upholding awards and granting decrees in terms of awards are upheld.
Orders
- Impugned judgment of the High Court is set aside.
- Orders of the Subordinate Judge upholding the awards are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment