M/S. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE

M/S. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE

The determination of whether cotton waste is dutiable as a manufactured product requires re-consideration in light of the established principle that inclusion in the schedule alone does not render a commodity exigible to excise unless a process of manufacture is involved. The issue is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.

Parties
Appellant: MIS. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD.; Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
22 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
Outcome
Appeals partly allowed; orders of Tribunal set aside; appeals remanded to Tribunal for fresh decision on the core question.
Legal Topics
Excisability of Waste, Manufacture Under Excise Law, Extended Period of Limitation, Penalty Under Excise Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MIS. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD.

Appellant

Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether soft cotton waste generated during manufacture of exportable yarn is excisable as a manufactured product under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
  2. 2 Whether the Department is entitled to invoke the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Act
  3. 3 Whether mere inclusion of an item in the tariff schedule makes it excisable without manufacture

Ratio Decidendi

The determination of whether cotton waste is dutiable as a manufactured product requires re-consideration in light of the established principle that inclusion in the schedule alone does not render a commodity exigible to excise unless a process of manufacture is involved. The issue is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.

Court Disposition

Appeals partly allowed; orders of Tribunal set aside; appeals remanded to Tribunal for fresh decision on the core question.

Orders

  • Order of Tribunal set aside.
  • Appeals remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision.