M/S. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE
The determination of whether cotton waste is dutiable as a manufactured product requires re-consideration in light of the established principle that inclusion in the schedule alone does not render a commodity exigible to excise unless a process of manufacture is involved. The issue is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.
- Parties
- Appellant: MIS. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD.; Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeals partly allowed; orders of Tribunal set aside; appeals remanded to Tribunal for fresh decision on the core question.
- Legal Topics
- Excisability of Waste, Manufacture Under Excise Law, Extended Period of Limitation, Penalty Under Excise Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIS. C.T. COTTON YARN LTD.
Appellant
Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Customs, Excise and Gold (control) Appellate Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether soft cotton waste generated during manufacture of exportable yarn is excisable as a manufactured product under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
- 2 Whether the Department is entitled to invoke the extended period of limitation under Section 11A of the Act
- 3 Whether mere inclusion of an item in the tariff schedule makes it excisable without manufacture
Ratio Decidendi
The determination of whether cotton waste is dutiable as a manufactured product requires re-consideration in light of the established principle that inclusion in the schedule alone does not render a commodity exigible to excise unless a process of manufacture is involved. The issue is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.
Court Disposition
Appeals partly allowed; orders of Tribunal set aside; appeals remanded to Tribunal for fresh decision on the core question.
Orders
- Order of Tribunal set aside.
- Appeals remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment