M/S. I.T.L. LTD. versus M/S. SIEMENS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK LTD.
When Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 confers a right of appeal to a civil court under Section 37, and Code of Civil Procedure is not expressly excluded by the Act, revision under Section 115 CPC lies to the High Court; bar on second appeals does not extend to revisions. Appellant is directed to first approach the High Court, as revision is an efficacious alternate remedy and there is no urgency justifying bypassing it.
- Parties
- Appellant: MIS. I. T. I. LTD.; Respondent: MIS. SIEMENS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK LTD.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of I0th Additional City Civil and Sessions Court, Bangalore, in Misc. Appeal No. 6 of 2002
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Revision Under Section 115 CPC, Appeal Under Section 37 Arbitration Act, Jurisdictional Limits, Efficacious Alternate Remedy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIS. I. T. I. LTD.
Appellant
MIS. SIEMENS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK LTD.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of I0th Additional City Civil and Sessions Court, Bangalore, in Misc. Appeal No. 6 of 2002
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a revision petition under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code lie to the High Court against an order made by a civil court in appeal preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
- 2 Is such a remedy an efficacious alternate remedy in the facts of the case?
Ratio Decidendi
When Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 confers a right of appeal to a civil court under Section 37, and Code of Civil Procedure is not expressly excluded by the Act, revision under Section 115 CPC lies to the High Court; bar on second appeals does not extend to revisions. Appellant is directed to first approach the High Court, as revision is an efficacious alternate remedy and there is no urgency justifying bypassing it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant directed to approach High Court first.
- If revision petition is filed within 30 days, High Court to entertain it without considering limitation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment