M/S RAPTAKOS, BRETT & CO. LTD. versus M/S GANESH PROPERTY
The respondent, having relinquished the claim for mesne profits in the earlier suit, is barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC and estoppel from filing a subsequent suit for mesne profits for the same period. The issue of mesne profits attained finality and the second suit does not disclose a cause of action.
- Parties
- Appellant: MIS RAPTAKOS, BRETT & CO. LTD.; Respondent: MIS GANESH PROPERTY
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Subsequent suit not maintainable.
- Legal Topics
- Order II Rule 2 CPC, Mesne Profits, Estoppel, Res Judicata
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MIS RAPTAKOS, BRETT & CO. LTD.
Appellant
MIS GANESH PROPERTY
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subsequent suit for mesne profits by the respondent after relinquishing the claim in an earlier suit is maintainable under Order II Rule 2 CPC
- 2 Whether the respondent is estopped from claiming mesne profits in a fresh suit after not pressing the claim in earlier proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent, having relinquished the claim for mesne profits in the earlier suit, is barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC and estoppel from filing a subsequent suit for mesne profits for the same period. The issue of mesne profits attained finality and the second suit does not disclose a cause of action.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Subsequent suit not maintainable.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- Civil Suit No. 457 of 1998 (for mesne profits) stands rejected/does not disclose cause of action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment