MODERN TERRY TOWEL LTD. versus SOLANKI MULJIBHAI REVABHAI HARIJAN VYAS AND ORS.
The High Court ought to have considered and allowed the refund of the amounts deposited by the appellant, since compensation had been paid, pollution control norms satisfied, and the case was distinct from other pending cases. The failure to order refund requires the remittal of the matter for fresh consideration.
- Parties
- Appellant: MODERN TERRY TOWEL LTD.; Respondents: SOLANKI MULJIBHAI REVABHAI HARJAN VYAS AND ORS.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Gujarat High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Pollution Control, Effluent Discharge, Factory Closure, Compensation for Environmental Damage, Refund of Deposited Amount
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MODERN TERRY TOWEL LTD.
Appellant
SOLANKI MULJIBHAI REVABHAI HARJAN VYAS AND ORS.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order of Gujarat High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to refund of the amount deposited as a condition for restarting the factory after compliance with pollution control norms and compensation paid to affected persons
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court ought to have considered and allowed the refund of the amounts deposited by the appellant, since compensation had been paid, pollution control norms satisfied, and the case was distinct from other pending cases. The failure to order refund requires the remittal of the matter for fresh consideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of High Court set aside
- Matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration of application for refund and disposal in accordance with law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment