MODULA INDIA versus KAMAKSHYA SINGH DEO
Even where a tenant’s defence is struck out under section 17(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, the defendant, subject to the court’s discretion and safeguards against prejudice to the plaintiff, may cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses and address arguments, but may not lead evidence or convert cross-examination into a presentation of his own case.
- Parties
- Appellant: Modula India; Respondent: Kamakshya Singh Deo
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 30.9.1982 of Calcutta High Court in Suit No. 568 of 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out of Defence, Right to Cross Examine After Defence Struck Out, West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Modula India
Appellant
Kamakshya Singh Deo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 30.9.1982 of Calcutta High Court in Suit No. 568 of 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the scope of the rights available to a defendant whose defence has been struck out under section 17(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956?
Ratio Decidendi
Even where a tenant’s defence is struck out under section 17(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, the defendant, subject to the court’s discretion and safeguards against prejudice to the plaintiff, may cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses and address arguments, but may not lead evidence or convert cross-examination into a presentation of his own case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Suit restored to trial Judge for further proceedings in light of judgment
- Costs of appeal to form part of suit costs and abide result thereof
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment