MOHAMMAD KHA,LIL versus KAMARUDDIN
The High Court was competent to dispose of the appeal on merits even though counsel for one of the appellants was absent, and properly confirmed the decree of the appellate court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohammad Khalil; Respondent: Kamaruddin
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Appellate Decree
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Specific Performance, Dismissal of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Parties
Mohammad Khalil
Appellant
Kamaruddin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Appellate Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was competent to dispose of the appeal on merits when one of the appellants was absent
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court was competent to dispose of the appeal on merits even though counsel for one of the appellants was absent, and properly confirmed the decree of the appellate court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment