MOHAN SINGH MALHI versus STATE OF PUNJAB
The requirement of three months' notice prior to compulsory retirement under Rule 5.32(c)(i) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Vol. II is satisfied if the government servant is paid three months' salary and allowances in lieu of notice. Such payment places the government servant in an advantageous position as he is relieved from official duty during that period.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohan Singh Malhi; Respondent: State of Punjab
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate From Full Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Retirement, Payment in Lieu of Notice, Interpretation of Service Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohan Singh Malhi
Appellant
State of Punjab
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Certificate From Full Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether under Rule 5.32(c) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Vol. II, the Government can retire an employee on or after attaining the age of 55 years by giving him three months' salary and allowances in lieu of three months' notice.
Ratio Decidendi
The requirement of three months' notice prior to compulsory retirement under Rule 5.32(c)(i) of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, Vol. II is satisfied if the government servant is paid three months' salary and allowances in lieu of notice. Such payment places the government servant in an advantageous position as he is relieved from official duty during that period.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal fails and is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment