MOHD. LAIQUIDDIN AND ANR. versus KAMALA DEVI MISRA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
Where a partnership firm consists of only two partners, on the death of one partner, the firm stands dissolved notwithstanding contrary provision in the partnership deed; the legal representatives of the deceased partner have no obligation to continue the partnership and distribution of property must follow the intention of the parties and partnership deed, allowing each to take respective properties with the respondent entitled to movables and recover value of embedded structures from the appellants.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohd. Laiquiddin and Anr.; Respondent: Kamala Devi Misra (Dead) by LRs. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Partnership, Distribution of Partnership Property, Raising New Legal Pleas in Second Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohd. Laiquiddin and Anr.
Appellant
Kamala Devi Misra (Dead) by LRs. and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in permitting respondents to raise a question for the first time in second appeal
- 2 Whether the High Court erred in holding that the partnership firm was dissolved on account of death of a partner
- 3 Whether the High Court erred in permitting respondents to remove movables from the cinema theatre
Ratio Decidendi
Where a partnership firm consists of only two partners, on the death of one partner, the firm stands dissolved notwithstanding contrary provision in the partnership deed; the legal representatives of the deceased partner have no obligation to continue the partnership and distribution of property must follow the intention of the parties and partnership deed, allowing each to take respective properties with the respondent entitled to movables and recover value of embedded structures from the appellants.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellants entitled to exclusive possession of land
- Respondents entitled to remove movables from cinema theatre
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment