MOHD. RAZA DABSTANI versus STATE OF BOMBAY AND ORS.
The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving change of domicile from Iran to India prior to November 21, 1949; residence and business activity alone did not establish requisite intention. His own consistent description as an Iranian national negated claim to Indian domicile and citizenship under Article 5 of the Constitution.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohd. Raza Dabstani; Respondents: State of Bombay and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 1966
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave After Dismissal by City Civil Court and Bombay High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Domicile, Nationality, Indian Citizenship Under Article 5, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohd. Raza Dabstani
Appellant
State of Bombay and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave After Dismissal by City Civil Court and Bombay High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had acquired Indian domicile before November 21, 1949 under Article 5 of the Constitution of India
- 2 Whether an Indian citizen can simultaneously be a national of another state
- 3 Whether residence alone is sufficient to prove change of domicile
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving change of domicile from Iran to India prior to November 21, 1949; residence and business activity alone did not establish requisite intention. His own consistent description as an Iranian national negated claim to Indian domicile and citizenship under Article 5 of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment