MOHD. SAUD & ANOTHER versus DR. (MAJ.) SHAIKH MAHFOOZ & OTHERS
After the amendment of Section 100-A CPC in 2002, a Letters Patent Appeal filed after 2002 against the judgment or order of the Single Judge of the High Court in an appeal, including appeals against interlocutory orders, is not maintainable; this interpretation curtails the number of appeals and avoids apparent contradictions in the drafting of Section 100-A.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohd. Saud & Another; Respondent: Dr. (Maj.) Shaikh Mahfooz & Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Orissa High Court Full Bench Decision in Letters Patent Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Maintainability of Letters Patent Appeal, Interpretation of Section 100 a CPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohd. Saud & Another
Appellant
Dr. (Maj.) Shaikh Mahfooz & Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Orissa High Court Full Bench Decision in Letters Patent Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable before the Division Bench against a judgment of the Single Judge of the High Court after the amendment of Section 100-A CPC in 2002
Ratio Decidendi
After the amendment of Section 100-A CPC in 2002, a Letters Patent Appeal filed after 2002 against the judgment or order of the Single Judge of the High Court in an appeal, including appeals against interlocutory orders, is not maintainable; this interpretation curtails the number of appeals and avoids apparent contradictions in the drafting of Section 100-A.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- No costs awarded
- Learned Additional District Judge directed to decide the suit expeditiously
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment