MOHINDER SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

MOHINDER SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

Entries in the revenue records are important but not conclusive for decisions under Rule 34C; competent orders/corrections of such records must also be considered. As a result, the authorities' decisions were vitiated by failure to consider the Naib Tahsildar's order and the Civil Court decree, and the matter must be reconsidered.

Parties
Appellant: Mohinder Singh; Respondents: State of Punjab & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 July 1977
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Punjab and Haryana High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; case remanded
Legal Topics
Evacuee Property, Urban Agricultural Land, Transfer to Displaced Persons, Revenue Record Entries, Judicial Review of Administrative Action
Property Law Displaced Persons Law Administrative Law Evacuee Property Urban Agricultural Land Transfer to Displaced Persons Revenue Record Entries Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohinder Singh

Appellant

State of Punjab & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Punjab and Haryana High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether entries in the revenue records are conclusive proof of possession/occupation under Rule 34C of the Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955
  2. 2 Whether correction of revenue entries by subsequent valid orders can be considered in allotment proceedings under the Rules

Ratio Decidendi

Entries in the revenue records are important but not conclusive for decisions under Rule 34C; competent orders/corrections of such records must also be considered. As a result, the authorities' decisions were vitiated by failure to consider the Naib Tahsildar's order and the Civil Court decree, and the matter must be reconsidered.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; case remanded

Orders

  • The orders of the High Court, the Financial Commissioner, and the Chief Settlement Commissioner are set aside.
  • Matter remanded to the Chief Settlement Commissioner for fresh disposal, to consider the Naib Tahsildar order and the Civil Court decree, subject to objections.