MOOLCHAND versus KEDAR (DECEASED) BY LRS. AND ORS.
Since the appellant's wife inherited the bhumidhari property from her father before the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, under her personal law she held only a limited estate in that property. Therefore, on her death, the property must devolve according to Section 172(2)(a)(i) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which refers to succession as per Section 171. The husband is not an heir under Section 171, and the property devolves upon the co-tenure holders by survivorship under Section 175. The appellant is hence not entitled to succeed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Moolchand; Respondents: Kedar (deceased) by LRs. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Inheritance, Succession, Co Tenure Holders, U.p. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, Limited Estate, Hindu Succession Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moolchand
Appellant
Kedar (deceased) by LRs. and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inheritance of bhumidhari rights of a female Hindu who died before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is governed by Section 172(2)(a)(i) or (ii) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.
- 2 Whether the appellant-husband is entitled to succeed to the bhumidhari share of his deceased wife, or whether it goes by survivorship to other co-tenure holders.
Ratio Decidendi
Since the appellant's wife inherited the bhumidhari property from her father before the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, under her personal law she held only a limited estate in that property. Therefore, on her death, the property must devolve according to Section 172(2)(a)(i) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which refers to succession as per Section 171. The husband is not an heir under Section 171, and the property devolves upon the co-tenure holders by survivorship under Section 175. The appellant is hence not entitled to succeed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Property in question shall devolve on the co-tenure holders (respondents) by survivorship.
- No order as to costs; costs on the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment