MR. ANURAG MITTAL versus MRS. SHAILY MISHRA MITTAL
A second marriage during the pendency of appeal against a divorce decree is not void where the parties to the earlier marriage have settled and the appeal has been applied to be withdrawn, even if formal dismissal is pending; Section 5(i) is not attracted—first spouse cannot be considered living; Section 15...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: MR. ANURAG MITTAL; Respondent: MRS. SHAILY MISHRA MITTAL
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; marriage between appellant and respondent not void.
- Legal Topics
- Marriage Validity, Hindu Marriage Act, Second Marriage During Pending Appeal, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MR. ANURAG MITTAL
Appellant
MRS. SHAILY MISHRA MITTAL
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does dismissal of appeal relate back to the date of filing withdrawal application?
- 2 Is a second marriage during pendency of an appeal against a divorce decree void under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 s. 5(i) and s. 15?
Ratio Decidendi
A second marriage during the pendency of appeal against a divorce decree is not void where the parties to the earlier marriage have settled and the appeal has been applied to be withdrawn, even if formal dismissal is pending; Section 5(i) is not attracted—first spouse cannot be considered living; Section 15 restriction does not apply when parties have settled and decided not to pursue appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment set aside; marriage between appellant and respondent not void.
Orders
- High Court judgment of nullity is set aside.
- Appellant's marriage with respondent is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment