M/S. CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN SERVICES versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

M/S. CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN SERVICES versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Even in absence of proof of exact loss, in a contract for public utility, reasonable compensation may be awarded for delay, subject to the maximum stipulated in the contract, unless the party committing breach proves that no loss was suffered. In absence of evidence, awarding half the claimed amount as reasonable compensation is appropriate.

Parties
Appellant: M/S. Construction & Design Services; Respondent: Delhi Development Authority
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court's Division Bench and Dismissal of Review Petition
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed
Legal Topics
Liquidated Damages, Penalty, Breach of Contract, Compensation
Contract Law Liquidated Damages Penalty Breach of Contract Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M/S. Construction & Design Services

Appellant

Delhi Development Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court's Division Bench and Dismissal of Review Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 When and to what extent can stipulated liquidated damages be treated as penalty in absence of actual loss?
  2. 2 Is the burden to prove that no loss was likely to be suffered on the party committing breach?

Ratio Decidendi

Even in absence of proof of exact loss, in a contract for public utility, reasonable compensation may be awarded for delay, subject to the maximum stipulated in the contract, unless the party committing breach proves that no loss was suffered. In absence of evidence, awarding half the claimed amount as reasonable compensation is appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed

Orders

  • Decree of the High Court is modified; the respondent is entitled to half the amount claimed with interest as awarded by the High Court.
  • Out of the amount deposited in Court, respondent may withdraw the decretal amount and appellant may withdraw the rest.