M/S ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD. versus M/S SUPER CASSETTE INDUSTRIES LTD.
Section 31(2) of Copyright Act, 1957 refers to clause (a) of Section 31(1), not clause (b); unreasonable terms offered by copyright owners for licensing amount to refusal, enabling Copyright Board's jurisdiction to grant compulsory licences for broadcast; Board must comply with principles of natural justice and properly consider evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.; Respondent: M/S Super Cassette Industries Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals Against High Court Orders
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; order of Copyright Board set aside; matter remitted to Board for fresh consideration on merits.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Licences, Copyright Board Jurisdiction, Principles of Natural Justice, Interpretation of Copyright Act, 1957, Doctrine of Purposive Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S Entertainment Network (India) Ltd.
Appellant
M/S Super Cassette Industries Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals Against High Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Copyright Board has jurisdiction under Section 31(1)(b) of Copyright Act, 1957 to direct owner of copyright to issue compulsory licences for radio broadcast
- 2 Whether compulsory licence can be issued to more than one complainant under Section 31(2)
- 3 Relevant considerations for Copyright Board when granting compulsory licence and determining compensation
Ratio Decidendi
Section 31(2) of Copyright Act, 1957 refers to clause (a) of Section 31(1), not clause (b); unreasonable terms offered by copyright owners for licensing amount to refusal, enabling Copyright Board's jurisdiction to grant compulsory licences for broadcast; Board must comply with principles of natural justice and properly consider evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; order of Copyright Board set aside; matter remitted to Board for fresh consideration on merits.
Orders
- Copyright Board's order set aside.
- Matter remitted to Copyright Board for reconsideration, with proper opportunity to parties and reasoned order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment