M/S. HOLOSTICK INDIA LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NOIDA
The security hologram part of the product is primary and the self-adhesive part only incidental in so far as the user of the goods is concerned. Therefore, the product is classifiable under Tariff Entry 49.01.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S. Holostick India Ltd.; Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Classification of Security Holograms, Interpretation of Tariff Entries, Application of Harmonised System of Nomenclature (hsn), Incidental Vs Primary Use for Tariff Classification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. Holostick India Ltd.
Appellant
Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether security holograms manufactured by the appellant are classifiable under Tariff Entry 39.19 as self-adhesive plates, sheets, etc. of plastics, or under Tariff Entry 49.01 as other products of the printing industry
Ratio Decidendi
The security hologram part of the product is primary and the self-adhesive part only incidental in so far as the user of the goods is concerned. Therefore, the product is classifiable under Tariff Entry 49.01.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- CESTAT judgment dated 19.12.2003 set aside
- Product to be classified under Tariff Entry 49.01
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment