M/S. HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. & ORS. versus MR. RAM PARSHOTAM MITTAL & ORS.
The High Court, having heard the appeal on merits and recorded reasons, was within its jurisdiction to extend the interim relief for a limited period beyond withdrawal of the appeal, to facilitate the party seeking alternative remedy; such extension is not improper when reasons are assigned and the matter is heard on merits.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S. HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD.; Respondent: Mr. Ram Parshotam Mittal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Dismissed After Hearing Merits; SLP Dismissed as Infructuous
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; SLP dismissed as infructuous
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Interim Relief, Withdrawal of Appeal, Functus Officio, Propriety of Interim Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD.
Appellant
Mr. Ram Parshotam Mittal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Dismissed After Hearing Merits; SLP Dismissed as Infructuous
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether High Court can extend interim relief beyond withdrawal or disposal of appeal
- 2 Propriety of High Court observations relating to merits upon withdrawal
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court, having heard the appeal on merits and recorded reasons, was within its jurisdiction to extend the interim relief for a limited period beyond withdrawal of the appeal, to facilitate the party seeking alternative remedy; such extension is not improper when reasons are assigned and the matter is heard on merits.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; SLP dismissed as infructuous
Orders
- Appeal dismissed, no order as to costs.
- Interim relief granted earlier by Supreme Court stands vacated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment