M/S INDIAN MEDICINES PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION LTD versus KERALA AYURVEDIC CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. & ORS.
Paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the National AYUSH Mission Operational Guidelines places IMPCL and other Central/State PSUs, pharmacies under State Governments and cooperatives on an equal footing; the State's procurement of Ayurvedic medicines exclusively from IMPCL by nomination without inviting tenders was arbitrary and violative of Article 14. Procurement must ordinarily be through a transparent process such as tenders; deviation from tendering is permissible only in exceptional circumstances supported by cogent material.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S INDIAN MEDICINES PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION LTD; First Respondent: KERALA AYURVEDIC CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Decided by Supreme Court (judgment Dated January 03, 2023)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 14, Tendering, State Largesse, Judicial Review of Government Contracts, National AYUSH Mission Operational Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S INDIAN MEDICINES PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION LTD
Appellant
KERALA AYURVEDIC CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Decided by Supreme Court (judgment Dated January 03, 2023)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether procurement of Ayurvedic medicines solely from IMPCL without inviting tenders violated Article 14 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the National AYUSH Mission Operational Guidelines permits nomination of a single supplier without a transparent process
- 3 Extent and ambit of judicial review of government contracts and when deviation from tender/auction is permissible
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the National AYUSH Mission Operational Guidelines places IMPCL and other Central/State PSUs, pharmacies under State Governments and cooperatives on an equal footing; the State's procurement of Ayurvedic medicines exclusively from IMPCL by nomination without inviting tenders was arbitrary and violative of Article 14. Procurement must ordinarily be through a transparent process such as tenders; deviation from tendering is permissible only in exceptional circumstances supported by cogent material.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals dismissed
- Appellant (State / procuring agency) directed henceforth to procure Ayurvedic medicines by a free and transparent procedure such as inviting tenders; deviation from tendering/auction route permitted only in exceptional circumstances demonstrated by cogent material
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment