M/S. JOY AUTO WORKS & ORS versus SUMER BUILDERS (P) LTD. & ANR.
Given the absence of an existing alternate motorable access and the specific facts of the case, ad-interim protection in the form of motorable access through plot no.879 must be preserved to avoid irreparable harm to the appellants and ensure their plots are not land-locked while the suit is pending or until the 40 feet D.P. Road is constructed.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S. Joy Auto Works & Ors; Respondent: Sumer Builders (P) Ltd.; Respondent: Bombay Municipal Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Interim Order of High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (interim relief granted)
- Legal Topics
- Easement, Right of Passage, Interim Injunction, Town Planning Scheme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. Joy Auto Works & Ors
Appellant
Sumer Builders (P) Ltd.
Respondent
Bombay Municipal Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Interim Order of High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants are entitled to an interim order granting motorable access to plot no.878 through plot no.879 during the pendency of the suit
- 2 Whether denial of such access would cause irreparable injury to the appellants
Ratio Decidendi
Given the absence of an existing alternate motorable access and the specific facts of the case, ad-interim protection in the form of motorable access through plot no.879 must be preserved to avoid irreparable harm to the appellants and ensure their plots are not land-locked while the suit is pending or until the 40 feet D.P. Road is constructed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (interim relief granted)
Orders
- Appellants are entitled to motorable access from the main road to plot no.878 through plot no.879 and the portion of plot no.879 in their possession, either until the disposal of the suit or until construction of the 40 feet wide D.P. road adjacent to plot no.878 by the Bombay Municipal Corporation, whichever is...
- Upon construction of the said D.P. Road providing access to plot no.878, respondent no.1 may move the Trial Court for revocation of this right of way; this order will not prevent the Trial Court from passing such an order if sufficient access is then available.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment