M/S. KESORAM COTTQN MILLS LTD versus GANGADHAR AND OTHERS
Suspended workmen, if reinstated, are entitled to full wages from the date of the agreement up to award enforcement; if dismissed without inquiry as envisaged by the agreement, they are still entitled to wages till enforcement of the award. Inquiry for 5 workmen violated principles of natural justice as witness...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/s. Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd.; Respondents: Gangadhar and others; Respondents (in CA No. 426 of 1962): M/s. Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd.; Appellants (in CA No. 426 of 1962): Gangadhar and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against Award of First Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal
- Outcome
- Appeal by management dismissed; appeal by workmen allowed in part with modification of award.
- Legal Topics
- Suspension of Workmen, Dismissal During Inquiry, Principles of Natural Justice, Compensation and Wages During Suspension, Standing Orders Under Industrial Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/s. Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd.
Appellant
Gangadhar and others
Respondents
M/s. Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd.
Respondents (in CA No. 426 of 1962)
Gangadhar and others
Appellants (in CA No. 426 of 1962)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against Award of First Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement of suspended workmen to wages/compensation during suspension period
- 2 Propriety of procedures used during disciplinary inquiries
- 3 Entitlement of dismissed workmen to reinstatement or compensation
Ratio Decidendi
Suspended workmen, if reinstated, are entitled to full wages from the date of the agreement up to award enforcement; if dismissed without inquiry as envisaged by the agreement, they are still entitled to wages till enforcement of the award. Inquiry for 5 workmen violated principles of natural justice as witness statements were not provided in advance; dismissal of 4 justified by evidence before tribunal. Clause 7 and 9 of the agreement interpreted to mean that reinstated workmen cannot be deprived of wages for suspension period.
Court Disposition
Appeal by management dismissed; appeal by workmen allowed in part with modification of award.
Orders
- Fifteen workmen reinstated to be paid full wages from December 24, 1957.
- One workman (Hiralal Bhomick) reinstated with full wages from date of suspension.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment