M/S LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. versus CHARANJEET SINGH
A subsequent purchaser who steps into the shoes of an original allottee may, depending on the facts, be entitled to refund of the principal with interest; the Court held that previous categorical rulings denying interest to subsequent purchasers are not good law and directed that interest be awarded at 9% per annum...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S Laureate Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.; Respondent: Charanjeet Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dated 29 05 2019 in Consumer Complaint No.1183 of 2017
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed; impugned NCDRC order modified
- Legal Topics
- Refund of Consideration, Interest on Refund, Rights of Subsequent Purchaser (re Allottee), Delay in Delivery/possession, Force Majeure, Occupancy Certificate
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S Laureate Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
Appellant
Charanjeet Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dated 29 05 2019 in Consumer Complaint No.1183 of 2017
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a subsequent purchaser (re-allottee) who steps into the shoes of an original allottee is entitled to refund with interest where the builder fails to deliver possession within the stipulated time
- 2 Whether precedents that deny interest to subsequent purchasers (HUDA v. Raje Ram and Wing Commander Arifur Rahman Khan) remain good law
- 3 What is the appropriate rate and period for grant of interest where the builder acknowledged the transfer or acquired knowledge of it
Ratio Decidendi
A subsequent purchaser who steps into the shoes of an original allottee may, depending on the facts, be entitled to refund of the principal with interest; the Court held that previous categorical rulings denying interest to subsequent purchasers are not good law and directed that interest be awarded at 9% per annum from the date the builder acquired knowledge of or acknowledged the transfer (in the present case at least from April 2016).
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed; impugned NCDRC order modified
Orders
- Impugned order of the NCDRC modified to direct refund of the principal amounts with interest at 9% per annum from the date the builder acquired knowledge of the transfer or acknowledged it
- In the present case interest to be allowed at least from April 2016 (date builder was intimated)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment