M/S. MATHANIA FABRICS versus COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR
Exemption from excise duty for cotton fabrics processed without aid of power cannot be claimed if power is used in any part of the process, including ancillary operations. Notifications are to be applied as amended and not retrospectively unless expressly stated. Extended period of limitation under Section 11A is permissible when facts justify, with period reckoned backwards from the show cause notice date.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S. Mathania Fabrics; Appellant: Appellants in C.A. No. 1856/2005; Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Civil Appeal No. 1856/2005 dismissed; Civil Appeal No. 5398/2002 partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty Exemption, Extended Limitation Period, Application of Power in Manufacturing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. Mathania Fabrics
Appellant
Appellants in C.A. No. 1856/2005
Appellant
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exemption from excise duty applies to cotton fabrics processed with ancillary use of power
- 2 Whether invocation of extended period of limitation under Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 is permissible
Ratio Decidendi
Exemption from excise duty for cotton fabrics processed without aid of power cannot be claimed if power is used in any part of the process, including ancillary operations. Notifications are to be applied as amended and not retrospectively unless expressly stated. Extended period of limitation under Section 11A is permissible when facts justify, with period reckoned backwards from the show cause notice date.
Court Disposition
Civil Appeal No. 1856/2005 dismissed; Civil Appeal No. 5398/2002 partly allowed
Orders
- Penalty in Civil Appeal No. 1856/2005 reduced to Rs.25,00,000/-
- Commissioner to work out liability and penalty equivalent to tax demand in Civil Appeal No. 5398/2002
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment