M/S. MEENA DEVI JINDAL MEDICAL INSTITUTE & RESEARCH CENTRE versus LT. GOVERNOR, DELHI & ORS.
The notification specifying 'planned development of Delhi' was not vague as it was to be read in conjunction with the applicable zonal plan, which reserved the area for institutional purposes. Acquisition was for public purpose and valid under Section 3(f) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S. Meena Devi Jindal Medical Institute & Research Centre; Respondents: Lt. Governor, Delhi & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Purpose, Planned Development, Vagueness of Notification, Delhi Development Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. Meena Devi Jindal Medical Institute & Research Centre
Appellant
Lt. Governor, Delhi & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act for planned development of Delhi was vague and invalid.
- 2 Whether acquisition for institutional purposes reserved in the zonal plan amounts to public purpose under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The notification specifying 'planned development of Delhi' was not vague as it was to be read in conjunction with the applicable zonal plan, which reserved the area for institutional purposes. Acquisition was for public purpose and valid under Section 3(f) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed. No costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment