M/S. SERAJUDDIN & CO. versus THEIR WORKMEN
An industrial dispute between employees engaged at the head office (Calcutta) and the employer is not an industrial dispute concerning a mine under s. 2(a)(i) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the head office is not a mine. Therefore, the State Government of West Bengal was the appropriate government to refer the dispute for adjudication.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S. Serajuddin & Co.; Respondent: Their Workmen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Order Dated January 17, 1961, of the Fourth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal in Case No. VIII 71
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Dispute, Appropriate Government, Jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunal, Definition of Mine
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. Serajuddin & Co.
Appellant
Their Workmen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Order Dated January 17, 1961, of the Fourth Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal in Case No. VIII 71
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Government of West Bengal was the appropriate government to refer the industrial dispute between M/S. Serajuddin & Co. and its workmen to the Tribunal?
- 2 Whether a dispute involving the employees of the head office at Calcutta constitutes an industrial dispute concerning a mine under s. 2(a)(i) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
Ratio Decidendi
An industrial dispute between employees engaged at the head office (Calcutta) and the employer is not an industrial dispute concerning a mine under s. 2(a)(i) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the head office is not a mine. Therefore, the State Government of West Bengal was the appropriate government to refer the dispute for adjudication.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The reference by the State Government of West Bengal was valid.
- Appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment