CHHITARMAL versus M/S, SHAH PANNALAL CHANDULAL
A certificate under Article 133(1)(a) cannot be granted as the claim in the court of first instance did not reach Rs. 20,000. Article 133(1)(b) is also not applicable because the appeal does not involve a claim or question respecting property in addition to or other than the subject-matter; the judgment concerns only the money claimed.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Chhitarmal; Respondent: M/s Shah Pannalal Chandulal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Petition for Special Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Grant of Certificate Under Article 133
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chhitarmal
Petitioner
M/s Shah Pannalal Chandulal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Petition for Special Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether petitioner is entitled to a certificate for appeal to Supreme Court as a matter of right under Article 133(1)(b) of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi
A certificate under Article 133(1)(a) cannot be granted as the claim in the court of first instance did not reach Rs. 20,000. Article 133(1)(b) is also not applicable because the appeal does not involve a claim or question respecting property in addition to or other than the subject-matter; the judgment concerns only the money claimed.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Petition for special leave is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment