M/S TIRUPATI STEELS versus M/S SHUBH INDUSTRIAL COMPONENT & ANR.
The pre-deposit of 75% of the amount in terms of the arbitral award as required by section 19 of the MSMED Act, 2006 is mandatory before an application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be entertained; however, the appellate court may permit the deposit to be made in instalments if...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: M/S TIRUPATI STEELS; Respondent: M/S SHUBH INDUSTRIAL COMPONENT & ANR.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Judgment and Order Dated 09.04.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO COM No.4 of 2019
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Pre Deposit Under Section 19 MSMED, Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 Arbitration Act, 1996, Execution Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S TIRUPATI STEELS
Appellant
M/S SHUBH INDUSTRIAL COMPONENT & ANR.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Judgment and Order Dated 09.04.2019 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO COM No.4 of 2019
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pre-deposit of 75% of the awarded amount under section 19 of the MSMED Act, 2006 is mandatory before entertaining an application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
- 2 Whether the High Court correctly permitted proceedings under section 34 without insisting on the pre-deposit required by section 19 of the MSMED Act, 2006
Ratio Decidendi
The pre-deposit of 75% of the amount in terms of the arbitral award as required by section 19 of the MSMED Act, 2006 is mandatory before an application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be entertained; however, the appellate court may permit the deposit to be made in instalments if satisfied that depositing the entire amount at once would cause undue hardship.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned order of the High Court dated 09.04.2019 quashed and set aside
- Respondent No.1 directed to deposit 75% of the awarded amount before its application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is entertained and considered on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment