M/S UNIBROS versus ALL INDIA RADIO
The Second Award conflicted with the public policy of India because the Arbitrator ignored the High Court's limited remand direction and again awarded loss of profit without credible evidence of lost opportunities or profits; an award based on no evidence is patently illegal and perverse and thus can be set aside under section 34(2)(b).
- Parties
- Appellant: M/s Unibros; Respondent: All India Radio
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court, Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Profit, Hudson's Formula, Section 34(2)(b), Remand for Reconsideration, Arbitral Award Set Aside
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/s Unibros
Appellant
All India Radio
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court, Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral award conflicts with the public policy of India under section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
- 2 Whether a claim for loss of profit succeeds merely on the ground of delay in execution of a contract attributable to the employer
- 3 Whether Hudson's formula can be applied in absence of independent evidence of lost opportunities or profits
Ratio Decidendi
The Second Award conflicted with the public policy of India because the Arbitrator ignored the High Court's limited remand direction and again awarded loss of profit without credible evidence of lost opportunities or profits; an award based on no evidence is patently illegal and perverse and thus can be set aside under section 34(2)(b).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Cost awarded by the learned Single Judge is made easy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment