MUKRI GOPALAN versus CHEPPILAT PUTHANPURAYIL ABOOBACKER
Appellate authority constituted under Section 18 of Kerala Rent Act, 1965 is not persona designata but functions as a court; Section 29(2) of Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 5 (condonation of delay) are applicable to appeals under the Act; authority may condone delay if sufficient cause is shown.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mukrigopalan; Respondent: Cheppilat Puthanpura Yil Aboobacker
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Kerala High Court Judgment and Order Dated 22.7.94 in C.r.p.no. 2633 of 1994 G
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders of High Court and appellate authority quashed; matter remanded to appellate authority for fresh consideration of condonation application.
- Legal Topics
- Condonation of Delay, Persona Designata, Appellate Authority Power, Application of Limitation Act 1963 Section 29(2), Appeals Under Kerala Rent Act, 1965
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mukrigopalan
Appellant
Cheppilat Puthanpura Yil Aboobacker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Kerala High Court Judgment and Order Dated 22.7.94 in C.r.p.no. 2633 of 1994 G
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellate authority under Section 18 of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 is a persona designata or a court
- 2 Whether delay in filing appeal before appellate authority can be condoned by invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
- 3 Applicability of Section 29(2) of Limitation Act, 1963 to appeals under Section 18 of the Kerala Rent Act
Ratio Decidendi
Appellate authority constituted under Section 18 of Kerala Rent Act, 1965 is not persona designata but functions as a court; Section 29(2) of Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 5 (condonation of delay) are applicable to appeals under the Act; authority may condone delay if sufficient cause is shown.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders of High Court and appellate authority quashed; matter remanded to appellate authority for fresh consideration of condonation application.
Orders
- Rent Control Appeal No. 9/94 restored to file of District Judge, Thalassery as appellate authority.
- Appellate authority to consider I.A. 56/94 (condonation of delay) on merits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment