MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, INDORE versus RAI BAHADUR SETH HIRALAL & OTHERS
Section 2(c) of the 1954 Act saves taxes imposed under the old Act only to the extent they are consistent with the new Act. As s.73(2) requires house tax to be assessed on net annual letting value after deducting 10% statutory allowance, the levy at 7% of gross annual letting value was not consistent and not saved. The Corporation may adopt previous assessment lists under s.79, but must comply with ss.75 and 76, and may not impose tax contrary to s.73.
- Parties
- Appellant: Municipal Corporation, Indore; Respondents: Rai Bahadur Seth Hiralal & Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 1967
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order Dated December 7, 1963 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench in Second Appeal No. 378 of 1961
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Tax Assessment, Repeal and Saving Clauses, House Tax Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Municipal Corporation, Indore
Appellant
Rai Bahadur Seth Hiralal & Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order Dated December 7, 1963 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench in Second Appeal No. 378 of 1961
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether house tax under Madhya Bharat Municipalities Act, 1954 can be levied on gross annual letting value without deducting statutory allowance as prescribed by s.73(2)
- 2 Extent to which rules and taxes imposed under repealed Indore City Municipal Act, 1909 are saved by s.2(c) of the 1954 Act
Ratio Decidendi
Section 2(c) of the 1954 Act saves taxes imposed under the old Act only to the extent they are consistent with the new Act. As s.73(2) requires house tax to be assessed on net annual letting value after deducting 10% statutory allowance, the levy at 7% of gross annual letting value was not consistent and not saved. The Corporation may adopt previous assessment lists under s.79, but must comply with ss.75 and 76, and may not impose tax contrary to s.73.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Refund of excess amount collected ordered against appellant Corporation
- Appellant to pay costs for this appeal as well as for Appeal No. 383 of 1965; costs to be taxed on footing of one hearing fee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment