MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, PUSAD versus GOKALDAS DOSSA & CO. LTD.
Since the Boja and Bale Tax was actually imposed under section 66(1)(b) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, in 1932 (before the operation of the Profession Tax Limitation Act, 1941), it is exempt from the Rs. 250 ceiling under Article 276 of the Constitution as per Section 3 and Item 4 of the 1941 Act, and such imposition is valid.
- Parties
- Appellant: Municipal Council, Pusad; Respondent No. 1: Gokuldas Dossa & Co. Ltd.; Respondent No. 2: M. N. Shroff; Intervener: S. B. Saharya and V. B. Saharya
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of the Bombay High Court (nagpur Bench)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment of High Court set aside; writ petition dismissed; parties to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Professional Tax, Limits on Municipal Taxation, Exemptions Under Profession Tax Limitation Act, Interpretation of Proviso to Constitutional and Statutory Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Municipal Council, Pusad
Appellant
Gokuldas Dossa & Co. Ltd.
Respondent No. 1
M. N. Shroff
Respondent No. 2
S. B. Saharya and V. B. Saharya
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Order of the Bombay High Court (nagpur Bench)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Boja and Bale Tax imposed by the Municipal Council, Pusad, is ultra vires and unconstitutional for exceeding the ceiling in Article 276 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether the impugned tax is exempt from the statutory and constitutional ceilings under the relevant statutory provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Since the Boja and Bale Tax was actually imposed under section 66(1)(b) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, in 1932 (before the operation of the Profession Tax Limitation Act, 1941), it is exempt from the Rs. 250 ceiling under Article 276 of the Constitution as per Section 3 and Item 4 of the 1941 Act, and such imposition is valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment of High Court set aside; writ petition dismissed; parties to bear their own costs.
Orders
- Judgment of the Bombay High Court quashed and set aside.
- Writ petition of respondent dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment