MUNISH KAKKAR versus NIDHI KAKKAR
Where marriage between parties has irretrievably broken down, causing trauma and is emotionally dead after prolonged separation and failed reconciliation, Supreme Court can decree divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice, despite lack of statutory ground.
- Parties
- Appellant: Munish Kakkar; Respondent: Nidhi Kakkar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decree of divorce granted; marriage dissolved.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Cruelty, Maintenance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Munish Kakkar
Appellant
Nidhi Kakkar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether decree of divorce should be granted on grounds of cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
- 2 Whether Supreme Court can dissolve marriage using Article 142 of Constitution of India
Ratio Decidendi
Where marriage between parties has irretrievably broken down, causing trauma and is emotionally dead after prolonged separation and failed reconciliation, Supreme Court can decree divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution to do complete justice, despite lack of statutory ground.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decree of divorce granted; marriage dissolved.
Orders
- Decree of divorce granted under Article 142 of Constitution; marriage dissolved forthwith.
- Appellant to continue paying maintenance of Rs.7,500 per month to respondent; parties may seek enhancement, reduction, or cessation through appropriate proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment