MUNUSAMY versus THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
In absence of other comparable sales, the sale deed Ex.C1 dated 11.01.1990 (5½ cent sold for Rs.16,375 i.e. Rs.2,977 per cent) is a usable comparable; however because it was for a very small parcel the Court applied a 60% deduction to that rate and fixed market value at Rs.1,191 per cent; appellant entitled to compensation at Rs.1,191 per cent with statutory benefits.
- Parties
- Appellant: Munusamy; Respondent: The Land Acquisition Officer
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Assessment, Comparable Sale Evidence, Market Value Determination, Section 4 and Section 6 Notifications, Reference Under Section 18
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Munusamy
Appellant
The Land Acquisition Officer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sale deed dated 11.01.1990 executed by the landowner is a comparable sale for assessing market value
- 2 Whether a sale of a small parcel in favour of a relative can be relied upon for fixation of market value
- 3 Whether and what deduction should be applied when relying on a small-area comparable sale to determine compensation
Ratio Decidendi
In absence of other comparable sales, the sale deed Ex.C1 dated 11.01.1990 (5½ cent sold for Rs.16,375 i.e. Rs.2,977 per cent) is a usable comparable; however because it was for a very small parcel the Court applied a 60% deduction to that rate and fixed market value at Rs.1,191 per cent; appellant entitled to compensation at Rs.1,191 per cent with statutory benefits.
Court Disposition
Partly allowed
Orders
- Appellant entitled to compensation for the land acquired at Rs.1,191 per cent with all statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act
- Impugned judgment and order dated 30.07.2008 in A.S. No.1222 of 2001 is modified to the aforesaid extent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment