N. K. MOHAMMAD SULAIMAN versus N. C. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL AND OTHERS
Where a creditor institutes a suit for debt recovery or enforcement of mortgage after the death of a Muslim debtor and, after diligent and bona fide inquiry, impleads only those heirs believed to be the sole survivors, the heirs so impleaded sufficiently represent the entire estate. The decree passed is binding on all heirs, including those not impleaded, unless there was fraud, collusion, lack of fair trial, or the absent heir had a special defence not raised in the prior proceedings.
- Parties
- Appellant: N. K. Mohammad Sulaiman; Respondents: N. C. Mohammad Ismail and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Decree of Andhra Pradesh High Court Dated August 27, 1958, in Appeal Suit No. 113 of 1954
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Representation of Estate, Mortgage Enforcement, Decrees Binding Non Impleaded Heirs, Personal Law Relevance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N. K. Mohammad Sulaiman
Appellant
N. C. Mohammad Ismail and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Judgment and Decree of Andhra Pradesh High Court Dated August 27, 1958, in Appeal Suit No. 113 of 1954
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a decree obtained by a creditor against only those heirs known after bona fide inquiry binds the entire estate and heirs not impleaded
- 2 Whether personal law of the deceased is relevant to binding effect of decree
Ratio Decidendi
Where a creditor institutes a suit for debt recovery or enforcement of mortgage after the death of a Muslim debtor and, after diligent and bona fide inquiry, impleads only those heirs believed to be the sole survivors, the heirs so impleaded sufficiently represent the entire estate. The decree passed is binding on all heirs, including those not impleaded, unless there was fraud, collusion, lack of fair trial, or the absent heir had a special defence not raised in the prior proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appellant shall pay the court-fee payable on the memo of appeal as if he had not been permitted to appeal in forma pauperis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment