NAGARPALIKA THAKURDWARA versus KHALIL AHMED & ORS.
The suit was not only for recovery of money but also for permanent injunction and declaration. Section 102 CPC does not bar second appeal when the suit includes reliefs other than recovery of money. The High Court's dismissal of the second appeal solely on quantum was incorrect.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nagar Palika Thakurdwara; Respondents: Khalil Ahmed & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Second Appeal, Permanent Injunction, Declaration, Municipal Taxation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nagar Palika Thakurdwara
Appellant
Khalil Ahmed & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars a second appeal when the suit is for relief beyond recovery of money
- 2 Whether the subject matter of the suit was only for recovery of money or included other reliefs such as permanent injunction and declaration
Ratio Decidendi
The suit was not only for recovery of money but also for permanent injunction and declaration. Section 102 CPC does not bar second appeal when the suit includes reliefs other than recovery of money. The High Court's dismissal of the second appeal solely on quantum was incorrect.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment set aside
- Matter remitted to High Court for fresh consideration on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment