NAHAR SINGH versus HARNAK SINGH AND ORS.

NAHAR SINGH versus HARNAK SINGH AND ORS.

Since the agreement of sale lacked clarity regarding the exact area, boundaries, measurements, and khasra numbers of the property, and was deliberately undervalued to evade stamp duty and registration, the courts below were right in refusing specific performance as the property was vague and unidentifiable, and the agreement was void being opposed to public policy.

Parties
Appellant: Nahar Singh; Respondent: Harnak Singh; Respondents: Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 October 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Identifiability of Property, Public Policy in Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nahar Singh

Appellant

Harnak Singh

Respondent

Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave

  1. 1 Whether an agreement of sale for immovable property lacking specific description (area, boundaries, place, khasra numbers) can be specifically enforced.
  2. 2 Whether a contract deliberately undervalued to evade stamp duty/registration is enforceable.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the agreement of sale lacked clarity regarding the exact area, boundaries, measurements, and khasra numbers of the property, and was deliberately undervalued to evade stamp duty and registration, the courts below were right in refusing specific performance as the property was vague and unidentifiable, and the agreement was void being opposed to public policy.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.