NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY versus DISTT. OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.
Once the main list is exhausted, the supplementary list has no survival and cannot be used for further appointments, as this would result in exceeding the statutory 50% reservation ceiling established under Rule 15 of Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 and Article 16(4) of the Constitution. Any appointments from the supplementary list beyond the main list violate the statutory policy and reservation ceiling.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nair Service Society; Respondents: Distt. Officer, Kerala Public Service Commission and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment and Disposition After Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; High Court judgment declared incorrect, but appointments already made pursuant to High Court order not disturbed.
- Legal Topics
- Reservation in Public Service, Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958, Article 16(4) of Constitution, Appointment Procedures, Public Service Commission Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nair Service Society
Appellant
Distt. Officer, Kerala Public Service Commission and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment and Disposition After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointments from the supplementary list after exhaustion of the main list violate the statutory reservation ceiling of 50% as per Rule 15 of Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 and Article 16(4) of Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Once the main list is exhausted, the supplementary list has no survival and cannot be used for further appointments, as this would result in exceeding the statutory 50% reservation ceiling established under Rule 15 of Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 and Article 16(4) of the Constitution. Any appointments from the supplementary list beyond the main list violate the statutory policy and reservation ceiling.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; High Court judgment declared incorrect, but appointments already made pursuant to High Court order not disturbed.
Orders
- Appointments already made pursuant to the High Court judgment shall not be disturbed.
- No further appointments shall be made from the supplementary list once the main list is exhausted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment