NAND KUMAR & OTHERS versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

NAND KUMAR & OTHERS versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

The retracted confessions of the three appellants were voluntary, sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence (including recovery of incriminating objects, presence at the scene, and admissions before magistrate), justifying their conviction for murder; the fourth appellant’s conviction was justified by independent evidence and the statements of his co-accused in retracted confessions.

Parties
Appellant: Nand Kumar & Others; Respondent: State of Rajasthan
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 May 1962
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal by Special Leave From Rajasthan High Court’s Confirmation/reduction of Sentences and Convictions
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Murder, Robbery, Retracted Confession, Corroboration, Admissibility of Confession
Criminal Law Murder Robbery Retracted Confession Corroboration Admissibility of Confession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nand Kumar & Others

Appellant

State of Rajasthan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court: Appeal by Special Leave From Rajasthan High Court’s Confirmation/reduction of Sentences and Convictions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the retracted confessions of the appellants were voluntary and admissible
  2. 2 Whether there was sufficient corroboration to sustain conviction based on retracted confessions
  3. 3 Whether there was sufficient evidence against the fourth appellant who did not confess

Ratio Decidendi

The retracted confessions of the three appellants were voluntary, sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence (including recovery of incriminating objects, presence at the scene, and admissions before magistrate), justifying their conviction for murder; the fourth appellant’s conviction was justified by independent evidence and the statements of his co-accused in retracted confessions.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Convictions and sentences under s.302 and s.395, Indian Penal Code, confirmed for appellants Nand Kumar, Kalua, and Lakhan (death sentences); sentence for Murari reduced to life imprisonment; no interference warranted.