NAND KISHORE MARWAH & OTHERS versus SMT. SAMUNDRI DEVI
The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 does not apply to newly constructed buildings for a period of ten years from the date of first assessment for house-tax. Since the suit for eviction was instituted after the Act came into force and within the exemption period, the protection afforded by Sections 39 and 40 is not available to the tenants. Rights of the parties are determined as on the date of suit and not as per subsequent passage of time.
- Parties
- Appellant: NANO KISHORE MARWAH & OTHERS; Respondent: SMT. SAMUNDRI DEVI
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Allahabad High Court Civil Revision No. 83 of 1986
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Applicability of Rent Control Statute, Protection to Tenants Under U.p. Urban Buildings (regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NANO KISHORE MARWAH & OTHERS
Appellant
SMT. SAMUNDRI DEVI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Allahabad High Court Civil Revision No. 83 of 1986
Legal Issues
- 1 Applicability of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 to newly constructed buildings
- 2 Availability of protection to tenants under the Act
- 3 Interpretation of Sections 2, 39, 40 of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 does not apply to newly constructed buildings for a period of ten years from the date of first assessment for house-tax. Since the suit for eviction was instituted after the Act came into force and within the exemption period, the protection afforded by Sections 39 and 40 is not available to the tenants. Rights of the parties are determined as on the date of suit and not as per subsequent passage of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decree for eviction not to be executed until March 31, 1988, subject to appellants filing usual undertaking within four weeks
- In default, respondent may execute decree forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment