NANO KUMAR versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Daily wage employees appointed for a long period are not entitled to absorption or regularisation under Section 6 of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006 as they are not included within 'all officers and employees'; their status remains distinct from regular employees and they cannot claim the same benefits or invoke legitimate expectation for permanent appointment.
- Parties
- Appellant: NANO KUMAR; Respondent: STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment of Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Regularisation, Absorption of Daily Wagers, Statutory Interpretation—repeal Act S.6
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NANO KUMAR
Appellant
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment of Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether daily wage employees are entitled to absorption and regularisation under Section 6 of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006.
- 2 Whether 'all officers and employees' as used in Section 6(i) includes daily wage employees.
Ratio Decidendi
Daily wage employees appointed for a long period are not entitled to absorption or regularisation under Section 6 of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market (Repeal) Act, 2006 as they are not included within 'all officers and employees'; their status remains distinct from regular employees and they cannot claim the same benefits or invoke legitimate expectation for permanent appointment.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Decision of the High Court affirmed; no merit found in the appeals; daily wage employees not entitled to absorption or regularisation under s.6 of the Repeal Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment