NARENDRA KUMAR CHANDLA versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

NARENDRA KUMAR CHANDLA versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

An employer is obliged to adjust an employee incapacitated by disease in a suitable post with protection of his last drawn pay under Article 21, even if typing test requirements for L.D.C. are relaxed in exceptional circumstances.

Parties
Appellant: NARENDRA KUMAR CHANDLA; Respondents: STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 February 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab & Haryana High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Right to Livelihood, Service Benefits, Accommodation for Disabled Employees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NARENDRA KUMAR CHANDLA

Appellant

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab & Haryana High Court

  1. 1 Whether the employer is obligated to offer equivalent employment with protected pay to an employee who is incapacitated due to disease and cannot perform his technical duties
  2. 2 Validity of absorbing an employee in a post with lesser pay scale due to medical incapacity
  3. 3 Right to livelihood under Article 21 when employee cannot fulfill previous job duties

Ratio Decidendi

An employer is obliged to adjust an employee incapacitated by disease in a suitable post with protection of his last drawn pay under Article 21, even if typing test requirements for L.D.C. are relaxed in exceptional circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Respondent Board directed to relax typing test requirement and appoint appellant as L.D.C.
  • Appellant to be placed in the L.D.C. post with protected pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300.